Personal tools

Sponsorname

Your company could advertise here

www.fla-consulting.eu

Reference:ICH ICH E2A Guideline 1994 III A. 2.: Difference between revisions

From GxPlex

Jump to: navigation, search
m 1 revision imported
m 1 revision imported
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{#set:
{{ReferenceData
|HasDocument=Document:ICH ICH E2A Guideline 1994
|has_document=Document:ICH ICH E2A Guideline 1994
|RefScope=G
|module=5
|RefDocPart=III A. 2.
|unit=5.1.4
|RefLanguage=EN
|scope=G
|RefTagsEN=
|doc_part=III A. 2.
|RefTagsOriginal=
|language=EN
|RefTagsFR=
|entry_by=Florian Adragna
}}
|contributors=
 
|tags=TAG-00329-Saf-lne ++ TAG-00046-Ser-sSc ++ TAG-00252-Exp-hle ++ TAG-00327-Exa-spi
{{:Document:ICH ICH E2A Guideline 1994}}
|tags_display=[[Glossary:TAG-00329-Saf-lne|Safety]], [[Glossary:TAG-00046-Ser-sSc|Serious adverse event]], [[Glossary:TAG-00252-Exp-hle|Expedited reporting]], [[Glossary:TAG-00327-Exa-spi|Examples]]
 
|comment=Other safety observations beyond single case reports
{| class="gplx-infobox"
|content=2. Other Observations
|-
! colspan="2" class="gplx-infobox-header" | Reference Details
|-
! Scope
| G
|-
! Document part
| III A. 2.
|-
! Language
| EN
|-
! Original entry by
| Florian Adragna
|-
! Contributors
|
|-
! Tags (EN)
|
|-
! Tags (original language)
|
|-
! Tags (FR)
|  
|-
! Comment
| Other safety observations beyond single case reports
|}
 
== Content ==
2. Other Observations


There are situations in addition to single case reports of "serious" adverse events or reactions that may necessitate rapid communication to regulatory authorities; appropriate medical and scientific judgement should be applied for each situation. In general, information that might materially influence the benefit-risk assessment of a medicinal product or that would be sufficient to consider changes in medicinal product administration or in the overall conduct of a clinical investigation represents such situations. Examples include:
There are situations in addition to single case reports of "serious" adverse events or reactions that may necessitate rapid communication to regulatory authorities; appropriate medical and scientific judgement should be applied for each situation. In general, information that might materially influence the benefit-risk assessment of a medicinal product or that would be sufficient to consider changes in medicinal product administration or in the overall conduct of a clinical investigation represents such situations. Examples include:
Line 51: Line 18:
b. A significant hazard to the patient population, such as lack of efficacy with a medicinal product used in treating life-threatening disease.
b. A significant hazard to the patient population, such as lack of efficacy with a medicinal product used in treating life-threatening disease.
c. A major safety finding from a newly completed animal study (such as carcinogenicity).
c. A major safety finding from a newly completed animal study (such as carcinogenicity).
}}

Latest revision as of 13:50, 16 July 2026



Document information
Reference ICH ICH E2A Guideline 1994
Validity area ICH
Scope(s) G
Document name ICH E2A Guideline
Version / Revision 1994
Status Current
Document type International guideline
Language(s) EN
Description CLINICAL SAFETY DATA MANAGEMENT: DEFINITIONS AND STANDARDS FOR EXPEDITED REPORTING

E2A

Official source Official link
Restricted access No
Submitted by Florian Adragna
Contributors


Reference Details
Module Module 5 — Unit 5.1.4
Scope G
Document part III A. 2.
Language EN
Original entry by Florian Adragna
Contributors
Tags Safety, Serious adverse event, Expedited reporting, Examples

Content

2. Other Observations

There are situations in addition to single case reports of "serious" adverse events or reactions that may necessitate rapid communication to regulatory authorities; appropriate medical and scientific judgement should be applied for each situation. In general, information that might materially influence the benefit-risk assessment of a medicinal product or that would be sufficient to consider changes in medicinal product administration or in the overall conduct of a clinical investigation represents such situations. Examples include:

a. For an "expected," serious ADR, an increase in the rate of occurrence which is judged to be clinically important. b. A significant hazard to the patient population, such as lack of efficacy with a medicinal product used in treating life-threatening disease. c. A major safety finding from a newly completed animal study (such as carcinogenicity).