Reference:CIOMS CIOMS - International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects 2016 Page 20: Difference between revisions
From GxPlex
Gxplex admin (talk | contribs) m 1 revision imported |
Gxplex admin (talk | contribs) m 1 revision imported |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{ReferenceData | ||
| | |has_document=Document:CIOMS CIOMS - International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects 2016 | ||
| | |module=1 | ||
| | |unit=1.5.3 | ||
| | |scope=G | ||
| | |doc_part=Page 20 | ||
| | |language=EN | ||
| | |entry_by=Florian Adragna | ||
|contributors= | |||
|tags=TAG-00134-Eth-kom ++ TAG-00051-Eth-ngs ++ TAG-00033-Pro-oto | |||
|tags_display=[[Glossary:TAG-00134-Eth-kom|Ethics committee]], [[Glossary:TAG-00051-Eth-ngs|Ethics]], [[Glossary:TAG-00033-Pro-oto|Protocol]] | |||
|comment=Guideline on ethical review committees | |||
|content=Guideline 2: Ethical review committees | |||
|- | |||
|- | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
Guideline 2: Ethical review committees | |||
[...] | [...] | ||
Commentary on Guideline 2 | Commentary on Guideline 2 | ||
| Line 51: | Line 18: | ||
Sanctions imposed by governmental, institutional, professional or other authorities possessing disciplinary power should be employed as a last resort. Preferred methods of control include cultivation of an atmosphere of mutual trust, and education and support to promote in researchers and in sponsors the capacity for ethical conduct of research. | Sanctions imposed by governmental, institutional, professional or other authorities possessing disciplinary power should be employed as a last resort. Preferred methods of control include cultivation of an atmosphere of mutual trust, and education and support to promote in researchers and in sponsors the capacity for ethical conduct of research. | ||
Should sanctions become necessary, they should be directed at the non-compliant researchers or sponsors. They may include fines or suspension of eligibility to receive research funding, to use investigational interventions, or to practise medicine. Unless there are persuasive reasons to do otherwise, editors should refuse to publish the results of research conducted unethically, and retract any articles that are subsequently found to contain falsified or fabricated data or to have been based on unethical research. | Should sanctions become necessary, they should be directed at the non-compliant researchers or sponsors. They may include fines or suspension of eligibility to receive research funding, to use investigational interventions, or to practise medicine. Unless there are persuasive reasons to do otherwise, editors should refuse to publish the results of research conducted unethically, and retract any articles that are subsequently found to contain falsified or fabricated data or to have been based on unethical research. | ||
}} | |||
Latest revision as of 13:49, 16 July 2026
| Document information | |
|---|---|
| Reference | CIOMS CIOMS - International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research
Involving Human Subjects 2016 |
| Validity area | CIOMS |
| Scope(s) | G |
| Document name | CIOMS - International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research
Involving Human Subjects |
| Version / Revision | 2016 |
| Status | Current |
| Document type | International guideline |
| Language(s) | EN |
| Description | Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS)
International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects |
| Official source | Official link |
| Restricted access | No |
| Submitted by | Florian Adragna |
| Contributors | |
| Reference Details | |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 1 — Unit 1.5.3 |
| Scope | G |
| Document part | Page 20 |
| Language | EN |
| Original entry by | Florian Adragna |
| Contributors | |
| Tags | Ethics committee, Ethics, Protocol |
Content
Guideline 2: Ethical review committees [...] Commentary on Guideline 2 [...] Failure to submit a protocol to the committee should be considered a clear and serious violation of ethical standards. Sanctions imposed by governmental, institutional, professional or other authorities possessing disciplinary power should be employed as a last resort. Preferred methods of control include cultivation of an atmosphere of mutual trust, and education and support to promote in researchers and in sponsors the capacity for ethical conduct of research. Should sanctions become necessary, they should be directed at the non-compliant researchers or sponsors. They may include fines or suspension of eligibility to receive research funding, to use investigational interventions, or to practise medicine. Unless there are persuasive reasons to do otherwise, editors should refuse to publish the results of research conducted unethically, and retract any articles that are subsequently found to contain falsified or fabricated data or to have been based on unethical research.
