Personal tools

Sponsorname

Your company could advertise here

www.fla-consulting.eu

Reference:WHO WHO - Guidelines for GCP for trials on pharmaceutical products* 1995 3.2 - Consultation: Difference between revisions

From GxPlex

Jump to: navigation, search
m 1 revision imported
m 1 revision imported
Ā 
(9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{#set:
{{ReferenceData
|HasDocument=Document:WHO WHO - Guidelines for GCP for trials on pharmaceutical products* 1995
|has_document=Document:WHO WHO - Guidelines for GCP for trials on pharmaceutical products* 1995
|RefScope=HM
|module=1
|RefDocPart=3.2 - Consultation
|unit=1.5.4
|RefLanguage=EN
|scope=HM
|RefTagsEN=
|doc_part=3.2 - Consultation
|RefTagsOriginal=
|language=EN
|RefTagsFR=
|entry_by=Florian Adragna
}}
|contributors=
Ā 
|tags=TAG-00246-Inv-hte ++ TAG-00134-Eth-kom ++ TAG-00033-Pro-oto ++ TAG-00029-Inf-rte
== Document Information ==
|tags_display=[[Glossary:TAG-00246-Inv-hte|Investigator responsibilities]], [[Glossary:TAG-00134-Eth-kom|Ethics committee]], [[Glossary:TAG-00033-Pro-oto|Protocol]], [[Glossary:TAG-00029-Inf-rte|Informed consent]]
{{:Document:WHO WHO - Guidelines for GCP for trials on pharmaceutical products* 1995}}
|comment=Investigator obligations to consult ethics committee
Ā 
|content=3.2 Ethics committee
== Reference Details ==
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%;"
|-
! scope="row" style="width:200px;" | Scope
| HM
|-
! scope="row" style="width:200px;" | Document part
| 3.2 - Consultation
|-
! scope="row" style="width:200px;" | Language
| EN
|-
! scope="row" style="width:200px;" | Original entry by
| Florian Adragna
|-
! scope="row" style="width:200px;" | Contributors
| Ā 
|-
! scope="row" style="width:200px;" | Tags (EN)
| Ā 
|-
! scope="row" style="width:200px;" | Tags (original language)
|
|-
! scope="row" style="width:200px;" | Tags (FR)
| Ā 
|-
! scope="row" | Comment
| Investigator obligations to consult ethics committee
|}
Ā 
== Text ==
3.2 Ethics committee
[...]
[...]
The investigator, or the investigator and the sponsor, must consult the relevant ethics committee(s) regarding the suitability of a proposed clinical trial protocol (including appendices
The investigator, or the investigator and the sponsor, must consult the relevant ethics committee(s) regarding the suitability of a proposed clinical trial protocol (including appendices
Line 63: Line 30:
the trial subjects, as required by local laws and regulations.
the trial subjects, as required by local laws and regulations.
Ā Ā  g) The acceptability of proposed amendments to the protocol that are likely to affect the safety of the subjects or the conduct of the trial.
Ā Ā  g) The acceptability of proposed amendments to the protocol that are likely to affect the safety of the subjects or the conduct of the trial.
}}

Latest revision as of 13:49, 16 July 2026



Document information
Reference WHO WHO - Guidelines for GCP for trials on

pharmaceutical products* 1995

Validity area WHO
Scope(s) HM
Document name WHO - Guidelines for GCP for trials on

pharmaceutical products*

Version / Revision 1995
Status Current
Document type International guideline
Language(s) EN
Description World Health Organization

WHO Technical Report Series, No. 850, 1995, Annex 3 Guidelines for good clinical practice (GCP) for trials on pharmaceutical products*

Official source Official link
Restricted access No
Submitted by Florian Adragna
Contributors


Reference Details
Module Module 1 — Unit 1.5.4
Scope HM
Document part 3.2 - Consultation
Language EN
Original entry by Florian Adragna
Contributors
Tags Investigator responsibilities, Ethics committee, Protocol, Informed consent

Content

3.2 Ethics committee [...] The investigator, or the investigator and the sponsor, must consult the relevant ethics committee(s) regarding the suitability of a proposed clinical trial protocol (including appendices and amendments) and of the methods and materials to be used in obtaining and documenting the informed consent of the subjects. [...] Subjects must not be entered into the trial until the relevant ethics committee(s) has issued its favourable opinion on the procedures. The ethics committee should give its opinion and advice in writing within a reasonable time, clearly identifying the trial protocol, itemizing the documents studied and stating the date of review. A list of those present at the committee meeting, including their professional status, should be attached.

When reviewing a clinical trial proposal the ethics committee should consider the following:

  a) The acceptability of the investigator for the proposed trial, on the basis of sufficient information made available to the committee, in terms of his or her qualifications, experience, availability for the duration of the study, supporting staff and available facilities.
  b) The suitability of the protocol including the objectives of the study and the justification of predictable risks and inconveniences weighed against the anticipated benefits for the subjects and/or others, and the efficiency of its design, i.e. the potential for reaching sound conclusions with the smallest possible exposure of subjects.
  c) The means by which trial subjects will be recruited, necessary or appropriate information will be given, and consent will be obtained. This is particularly important in the case of trials

involving subjects who are members of a group with a hierarchical structure or another vulnerable group (see Section 3.3 e–f).

  d) The adequacy and completeness of the information, which should be written in a language and at a level of complexity understandable to everyone involved, to be given to the

subjects, their relatives, guardians or, if necessary, legal representatives. All such written information must be submitted in its final form to the ethics committee.

  e) Provision, if any, for compensation or treatment in the case of death or other loss or injury of a subject, if attributable to a clinical trial, and details of any insurance or indemnity (a source of legal and financial support) to cover the liability of the investigator(s) and sponsor. (See Section 5.9).
  f) The appropriateness of the extent and form of payment through which the sponsor will remunerate or compensate the organization(s) and/or investigator(s) conducting the trial, and

the trial subjects, as required by local laws and regulations.

  g) The acceptability of proposed amendments to the protocol that are likely to affect the safety of the subjects or the conduct of the trial.