Reference:GBR The Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations 2004 01-May-2004 Article 2 relevant ethics committee: Difference between revisions
From GxPlex
gxplex>GxPlexBot Import from GxPlex Excel |
Gxplex admin (talk | contribs) m 1 revision imported |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 15:28, 29 June 2026
| Document information | |
|---|---|
| Reference | GBR The Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations 2004 01-May-2004 |
| Validity area | GBR |
| Scope(s) | HM |
| Document name | The Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations 2004 |
| Version / Revision | 01-May-2004 |
| Status | Current |
| Document type | Legal act |
| Language(s) | EN |
| Description | The Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations 2004 |
| Official source | Official link |
| Restricted access | No |
| Submitted by | Florian Adragna |
| Contributors | |
| Reference Details | |
|---|---|
| Scope | HM |
| Document part | Article 2
relevant ethics committee |
| Language | EN |
| Original entry by | Florian Adragna |
| Contributors | |
| Tags (EN) | |
| Tags (original language) | |
| Tags (FR) | |
| Comment | Definition of relevant ethics committee in the context of a clinical trial |
Content
[…] “relevant ethics committee”, in relation to a clinical trial, means— (a)in a case where an ethics committee has given a favourable opinion in relation to that trial and paragraph 13 of Schedule 2 applies, the ethics committee which is the relevant ethics committee for that trial by virtue of sub-paragraph (5) of that paragraph; (b)in a case where an ethics committee has given an unfavourable opinion in relation to that trial but a favourable opinion has been given by an appeal panel in accordance with paragraph 4(4) of Schedule 4, that committee, or (c)in any other case, the ethics committee which has given a favourable opinion in relation to that trial in accordance with regulation 15; [...]