Reference:ICH ICH E2A Guideline 1994 III A. 1.: Difference between revisions
From GxPlex
Gxplex admin (talk | contribs) m 1 revision imported |
gxplex>GxPlexBot Import from GxPlex Excel |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{:Document:ICH ICH E2A Guideline 1994}} | {{:Document:ICH ICH E2A Guideline 1994}} | ||
{| class="gplx-infobox" | |||
{| class=" | |||
|- | |- | ||
! | ! colspan="2" class="gplx-infobox-header" | Reference Details | ||
|- | |||
! Scope | |||
| G | | G | ||
|- | |- | ||
! | ! Document part | ||
| III A. 1. | | III A. 1. | ||
|- | |- | ||
! | ! Language | ||
| EN | | EN | ||
|- | |- | ||
! | ! Original entry by | ||
| Florian Adragna | | Florian Adragna | ||
|- | |- | ||
! | ! Contributors | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
! | ! Tags (EN) | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
! | ! Tags (original language) | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
! | ! Tags (FR) | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
! | ! Comment | ||
| Causality assessment in clinical investigation cases | | Causality assessment in clinical investigation cases | ||
|} | |} | ||
== | == Content == | ||
[...] | [...] | ||
Causality assessment is required for clinical investigation cases. All cases judged by either the reporting health care professional or the sponsor as having a reasonable suspected causal relationship to the medicinal product qualify as ADRs. For purposes of reporting, adverse event reports associated with marketed drugs (spontaneous reports) usually imply causality. | Causality assessment is required for clinical investigation cases. All cases judged by either the reporting health care professional or the sponsor as having a reasonable suspected causal relationship to the medicinal product qualify as ADRs. For purposes of reporting, adverse event reports associated with marketed drugs (spontaneous reports) usually imply causality. | ||
[...] | [...] | ||
Revision as of 14:27, 29 June 2026
| Document information | |
|---|---|
| Reference | ICH ICH E2A Guideline 1994 |
| Validity area | ICH |
| Scope(s) | G |
| Document name | ICH E2A Guideline |
| Version / Revision | 1994 |
| Status | Current |
| Document type | International guideline |
| Language(s) | EN |
| Description | CLINICAL SAFETY DATA MANAGEMENT: DEFINITIONS AND STANDARDS FOR EXPEDITED REPORTING
E2A |
| Official source | Official link |
| Restricted access | No |
| Submitted by | Florian Adragna |
| Contributors | |
| Reference Details | |
|---|---|
| Scope | G |
| Document part | III A. 1. |
| Language | EN |
| Original entry by | Florian Adragna |
| Contributors | |
| Tags (EN) | |
| Tags (original language) | |
| Tags (FR) | |
| Comment | Causality assessment in clinical investigation cases |
Content
[...] Causality assessment is required for clinical investigation cases. All cases judged by either the reporting health care professional or the sponsor as having a reasonable suspected causal relationship to the medicinal product qualify as ADRs. For purposes of reporting, adverse event reports associated with marketed drugs (spontaneous reports) usually imply causality. [...]
