Personal tools

Sponsorname

Your company could advertise here

www.fla-consulting.eu

Reference:EU INS/GCP/46309/2012 - Classification and analysis of the GCP inspection findings of GCP inspections conducted at the request of the CHMP 2012 5: Difference between revisions

From GxPlex

Jump to: navigation, search
gxplex>GxPlexBot
Import from GxPlex Excel
Migrate to Template:ReferenceData for PageForms (GxPlexBot)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{#set:
{{ReferenceData
|HasDocument=Document:EU INS/GCP/46309/2012 - Classification and analysis of the GCP inspection findings of GCP inspections conducted at the request of the CHMP 2012
|has_document=Document:EU INS/GCP/46309/2012 - Classification and analysis of the GCP inspection findings of GCP inspections conducted at the request of the CHMP 2012
|RefScope=G
|module=4
|RefDocPart=5
|unit=4.5.2
|RefLanguage=EN
|scope=G
|RefTags=TAG-00044-Ins-ion ++ TAG-00043-Goo-tek ++ TAG-00058-Eur-zne
|doc_part=5
|RefModule=4
|language=EN
|RefUnit=4.5.2
|entry_by=Florian Adragna
}}
|contributors=
 
|tags=TAG-00044-Ins-ion ++ TAG-00043-Goo-tek ++ TAG-00058-Eur-zne
{{:Document:EU INS/GCP/46309/2012 - Classification and analysis of the GCP inspection findings of GCP inspections conducted at the request of the CHMP 2012}}
|tags_display=[[Glossary:TAG-00044-Ins-ion|Inspection]], [[Glossary:TAG-00043-Goo-tek|Good clinical practice]], [[Glossary:TAG-00058-Eur-zne|EMA]]
 
|comment=Overview of GCP inspections by CHMP
{| class="wikitable gplx-infobox"
|content=5. Results
|-
! colspan="2" class="gplx-infobox-header" | Reference Details
|-
! Module
| Module 4 — Unit 4.5.2
|-
! Scope
| G
|-
! Document part
| 5
|-
! Language
| EN
|-
! Original entry by
| Florian Adragna
|-
! Contributors
|
|-
! Tags
| [[Glossary:TAG-00044-Ins-ion|Inspection]], [[Glossary:TAG-00043-Goo-tek|Good clinical practice]], [[Glossary:TAG-00058-Eur-zne|EMA]]
|-
! Comment
| Overview of GCP inspections by CHMP
|}
 
== Content ==
5. Results


5.1. Overview of GCP inspections requested by the CHMP and carried out between 2000-2012
5.1. Overview of GCP inspections requested by the CHMP and carried out between 2000-2012
Line 47: Line 17:
Between 2000-2012, a total of 398 site inspections were carried out. The distribution of the number of inspections classified as routine and triggered is shown in figure 1. It can be seen that the number of inspections has increased since 2006 mainly, due to routine inspections in line with the implementation of the GCP Inspection policy in 2006.
Between 2000-2012, a total of 398 site inspections were carried out. The distribution of the number of inspections classified as routine and triggered is shown in figure 1. It can be seen that the number of inspections has increased since 2006 mainly, due to routine inspections in line with the implementation of the GCP Inspection policy in 2006.
[...]
[...]
}}

Revision as of 12:56, 16 July 2026



Document information
Reference EU INS/GCP/46309/2012

- Classification and analysis of the GCP inspection findings of GCP inspections conducted at the request of the CHMP 2012

Validity area EU
Scope(s) G
Document name INS/GCP/46309/2012

- Classification and analysis of the GCP inspection findings of GCP inspections conducted at the request of the CHMP

Version / Revision 2012
Status Current
Document type Information from official body
Language(s) EN
Description INS/GCP/46309/2012

Compliance and Inspections

Classification and analysis of the GCP inspection findings of GCP inspections conducted at the request of the CHMP (Inspection reports to EMA 2000-2012)

Official source Official link
Restricted access No
Submitted by Florian Adragna
Contributors


Reference Details
Module Module 4 — Unit 4.5.2
Scope G
Document part 5
Language EN
Original entry by Florian Adragna
Contributors
Tags Inspection, Good clinical practice, EMA

Content

5. Results

5.1. Overview of GCP inspections requested by the CHMP and carried out between 2000-2012

Between 2000-2012, a total of 398 site inspections were carried out. The distribution of the number of inspections classified as routine and triggered is shown in figure 1. It can be seen that the number of inspections has increased since 2006 mainly, due to routine inspections in line with the implementation of the GCP Inspection policy in 2006. [...]