Personal tools

Sponsorname

Your company could advertise here

www.fla-consulting.eu

Reference:CIOMS CIOMS - International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects 2016 Page 20: Difference between revisions

From GxPlex

Jump to: navigation, search
gxplex>GxPlexBot
Import from GxPlex Excel
m 1 revision imported
(No difference)

Revision as of 15:07, 29 June 2026



Document information
Reference CIOMS CIOMS - International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research

Involving Human Subjects 2016

Validity area CIOMS
Scope(s) G
Document name CIOMS - International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research

Involving Human Subjects

Version / Revision 2016
Status Current
Document type International guideline
Language(s) EN
Description Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS)

International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects

Official source Official link
Restricted access No
Submitted by Florian Adragna
Contributors


Reference Details
Scope G
Document part Page 20
Language EN
Original entry by Florian Adragna
Contributors
Tags (EN)
Tags (original language)
Tags (FR)
Comment Guideline on ethical review committees

Content

Guideline 2: Ethical review committees [...] Commentary on Guideline 2 [...] Failure to submit a protocol to the committee should be considered a clear and serious violation of ethical standards. Sanctions imposed by governmental, institutional, professional or other authorities possessing disciplinary power should be employed as a last resort. Preferred methods of control include cultivation of an atmosphere of mutual trust, and education and support to promote in researchers and in sponsors the capacity for ethical conduct of research. Should sanctions become necessary, they should be directed at the non-compliant researchers or sponsors. They may include fines or suspension of eligibility to receive research funding, to use investigational interventions, or to practise medicine. Unless there are persuasive reasons to do otherwise, editors should refuse to publish the results of research conducted unethically, and retract any articles that are subsequently found to contain falsified or fabricated data or to have been based on unethical research.